Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Guarantee and indemnity enforcement

Legal area

Court

24 Oct 2025

Teo Yek Ming 1. ) LKW PETROLEUM SDN BHD 2. ) Lee Kok Wai PIHAK KETIGA IWEALTH CAPITAL SDN. BHD.

Citation

BL-B52NCC-30-10/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Court

Sessions Court
Case number

BL-B52NCC-30-10/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)

On the balance of probabilities the plaintiff rebutted the statutory presumption under s.10OA by proving the loan was an intra‑member, one‑off facility consistent with its constitution and welfare activities; defendants defaulted under clear contractual terms, plaintiff validly exercised contractual rights to accelerate repayment; the agreed interest and default rates are enforceable because the plaintiff was not proven to be carrying on a moneylending business; the guarantee and indemnity rendered the director jointly and severally liable; third party indemnity/contribution claims failed for…
22 Apr 2025

EL FORWARDING SDN BHD 1. ) CARZO IMPORT (M) SDN BHD 2. ) CHEONG WAI KEH

Citation

WA-B52NCvC-421-10/2024 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Court

Sessions Court
Case number

WA-B52NCvC-421-10/2024 (Mahkamah Sesyen)

Defendant 2 acted with authority as agent for Defendant 1 when completing and signing the account and Guarantee and Indemnity forms; the signed Guarantee imposed primary liability on Defendant 2 for debts incurred for Defendant 1; plaintiff proved performance by delivery orders and invoices; therefore summary judgment against both defendants was proper.
3 Dec 2024

MONEYSAVE (M) SDN. BHD. 1. ) PARAGRENE LAND BERHAD 2. ) GREGORY AMOS YOON PENG SUM 3. ) WAN NASIR BIN WAN MUSTAFHA 4. ) ROZABIL @ ROZAMUJIB BIN ABDUL RAHMAN 5. ) GRENEPARK VILLAGE SDN. BHD.

Citation

WA-22NCC-522-08/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-22NCC-522-08/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Summary judgment was granted because the Plaintiff proved disbursement, production of signed Investment Note Certificates and a Guarantee and Indemnity, and contractual service of Notices of Default, while the Defendants failed to adduce any credible evidence to establish bona fide triable issues on non-payment, non-signature or non-receipt.
29 Sept 2023

ABDUL KADIR BIN HAJI SHEIKH FADZIR 1. ) MENARA JUTAMAS SDN BHD 2. ) AMCORP GLOBAL LIMITED (DAHULUNYA DIKENALI SEBAGAI TEE LAND LIMITED)

Citation

BA-22NCvC-361-09/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

BA-22NCvC-361-09/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The claim is barred by res judicata because the issues concerning the guarantee and indemnity, including beneficiary identity and entitlement to enforce, were raised or could and should have been raised in Suit 99 and subsequent appeals; the plaintiff failed to particularise any actual positive fraud as required by s 44 Evidence Act 1950; the action is an abuse of process and plainly and obviously unsustainable, therefore it is struck out.

Malaysia Case Law

Teo Yek Ming 1. ) LKW PETROLEUM SDN BHD 2. ) Lee Kok Wai PIHAK KETIGA IWEALTH CAPITAL SDN. BHD.

EL FORWARDING SDN BHD 1. ) CARZO IMPORT (M) SDN BHD 2. ) CHEONG WAI KEH

MONEYSAVE (M) SDN. BHD. 1. ) PARAGRENE LAND BERHAD 2. ) GREGORY AMOS YOON PENG SUM 3. ) WAN NASIR BIN WAN MUSTAFHA 4. ) ROZABIL @ ROZAMUJIB BIN ABDUL RAHMAN 5. ) GRENEPARK VILLAGE SDN. BHD.

ABDUL KADIR BIN HAJI SHEIKH FADZIR 1. ) MENARA JUTAMAS SDN BHD 2. ) AMCORP GLOBAL LIMITED (DAHULUNYA DIKENALI SEBAGAI TEE LAND LIMITED)