Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Leave to file affidavit

Legal area

Court

24 Jan 2024

AMIR SUFFIAN BIN SHADAAN 1. ) TIMBALAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI MALAYSIA 2. ) PENGUASA KANAN PUSAT PEMULIHAN AKHLAK BATU GAJAH, PERAK 3. ) KETUA POLIS NEGARA

Citation

BA-44-119-09/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

BA-44-119-09/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The court allowed leave to file the corrective affidavit because the respondents applied sufficiently before the hearing, the discrepancy in dates was a typographical error (inquiry was 25.6.2023; 19.6.2023 was the police investigation report date), granting leave causes no prejudice or mislead to the applicant, and the interest of justice under Order 1A Rules 2012 favored correction rather than striking the affidavit.
20 Oct 2023

Fivestar Luxury Sdn Bhd 1. ) Daya Intelek Usahasama Sdn Bhd 2. ) Ageson Development Sdn Bhd (sebelum ini dikenali sebagai Prinsiptek Properties Sdn Bhd) 3. ) Foo Chu Jong 4. ) Foo Chu Pak 5. ) FIVESTAR LUXURY SDN BHD 6. ) Tan Buck Lai 7. )

Citation

PA-22NCvC-61-03/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

PA-22NCvC-61-03/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Enclosure 135 is inadmissible because it does not raise any new serious question to be tried, affidavit evidence for the injunction proceeding had been exhausted and submissions had commenced, and the Plaintiff did not seek leave of court to file the additional affidavit as required under the authority of Lum Choon Realty; therefore Enclosure 135 cannot be used or referred to in the injunction application.