23 Jul 2025
XXXX XXXX
- Citation
- 22NCVC-520-09/2015 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- 22NCVC-520-09/2015 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Application for leave to enforce the 31 March 2016 judgment against the second and fourth defendants was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to provide any plausible or satisfactory explanation for the eight years seven months delay in enforcement; plaintiff was represented by solicitors and gave no justification for pursuing winding-up of the first defendant only.