Malaysia Case Law

22 Jun 2023

VICNASWARY A/P MUNIANDY @ MURUGIAH KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL

Citation

BA-16-22-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Court

High Court

Case number

BA-16-22-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The appeal was dismissed because it was filed after the 60‑day period prescribed by section 91(3) ESSA 1969 and there was no application before the court for an extension of time to regularise the late filing; notice of the preliminary objection had been given and the statutory limitation was decisive.

• Invalidity pension
• Limitation period for appeal
• Section 91(3) essa 1969
• Extension of time
• Preliminary objection

CHIHARU YABE (ZAUGG) & ANOR V. PENTADBIR TANAH WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA

Citation

CHIHARU YABE (ZAUGG) & ANOR V. PENTADBIR TANAH WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA

Court

Malaysian court

The appeal was dismissed as it was filed beyond the three-month period prescribed by s.418 NLC; independently, the Land Executive Committee had no lawful power under s.433B to decide the application for foreign acquisition because the Government of the Federation had not delegated that power to the LEC, rendering the LEC's decision null and void and leaving the application undecided by the proper authority.

• Restraint on dealings
• Non-citizen property purchase restrictions
• Bumiputera quota
• Limitation period for appeal
• Delegation of state authority
• Interpretation of administrative guidelines