1 Jan 2021
ABDUL RAHMAN BIN ROSLI
- Citation
- DA-42S-9-05/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- DA-42S-9-05/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Victim's testimony of penile penetration was corroborated by medical evidence of hymen tears and prompt complaint; because the victim was under sixteen consent was irrelevant; missing offered witnesses were not material and did not amount to suppression warranting adverse inference; accordingly the conviction and the sentence were upheld.