28 Sept 2022
Chai Teng Kooi (Selaku Wasi Harta Pusaka Ooi Tiong Joo) PANG SOON ENG
- Citation
- JA-24NCvC-334-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- JA-24NCvC-334-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Defendant did not have a caveatable interest because the alleged purchaser had not paid the full purchase price and therefore had no beneficial ownership; the caveator failed to establish a serious question and on balance of convenience the caveat should be removed under s.327 NLC. Consequently the court allowed the plaintiff’s application to remove the private caveat.