24 Mar 2025
PEMPETISYEN L E N (F) 1. ) P E N 2. ) Y E N
- Citation
- WA-33-419-08/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-33-419-08/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The Proposed Intervener was permitted to be joined because prima facie evidence indicated the Child’s proprietary and pecuniary interests in the TR Property that would be directly affected by the matrimonial proceedings, the Respondent’s failure to reply amounted to an admission supporting that prima facie case and his refusal to undergo DNA testing justified an adverse inference; intervention under procedural rules was therefore proper to protect the Child’s rights without pre-judging substantive trust issues.