Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Order 28 rule 8 roc 2012

Legal area

Court

8 Oct 2025

SHELL MDS (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD 1. ) PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD (PETRONAS) 2. ) PETROLEUM SARAWAK BERHAD PIHAK TERKILAN Kerajaan Malaysia BUKAN PIHAK-PIHAK KERAJAAN NEGERI SARAWAK

Citation

WA-24NCvC-4367-11/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-24NCvC-4367-11/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Order 17 ROC 2012 constitutes a self-contained interpleader procedure and Order 28 rule 8 does not apply to convert such proceedings into writs; alternatively, even if conversion were available, the disputes here are predominantly legal and documentary concerning statutory interpretation and contractual entitlement, adequately resolved on affidavit, so there is no necessity for oral evidence — therefore the application to convert (Enclosure 84) is dismissed and the matter remains an interpleader under Order 17.
12 Apr 2022

ABDULLAH SANI BIN HASHIM 1. ) Azizah Binti Hashim 2. ) Yusman Bin Mad Yunus 3. ) Norazman Bin Mad Yunus 4. ) Mohd Syafiq Bin Mad Yunus

Citation

WA-24NCvC-184-01/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-24NCvC-184-01/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Because the applicant alleged fraud and a substantial dispute of fact was inevitable, the originating summons was an improper mode; the court declined to exercise its discretion to convert under O 28 r 8 ROC 2012 and struck out the originating summons with liberty to file afresh by way of a writ.