Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Order 34 roc

Legal area

Court

18 Jul 2025

TETUAN JUBLIN TAN & TEY 1. ) WONG SEK ER 2. ) TEY POH CHOON 3. ) HOLSTEN MARKETING (M) SDN BHD

Citation

WA-A52NCvC-534-07/2024 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Court

Sessions Court
Case number

WA-A52NCvC-534-07/2024 (Mahkamah Sesyen)

Plaintiff failed to comply with clear pre-trial filing directions under Order 34 for approximately ten months without a satisfactory explanation; under Order 34 and supporting authorities an unless/self-executing order permits the court to strike out non-compliant proceedings; therefore the amended writ and amended statement of claim are struck out to prevent undue delay in the administration of justice.
19 May 2023

RCB MARKETING SDN BHD MILANO MARKETING SDN BHD

Citation

PA-22IP-1-12/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

PA-22IP-1-12/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Absent exceptional circumstances, the trial should not be bifurcated; the documents sought by RCB are relevant and necessary for the fair and economical disposal of the action under Order 24 Rules 3 and 7 and must be produced; RCB's application for production is allowed with costs.
2 Mar 2022

DHAMODARAN A/L MUNUSAMY 1. ) KAVARIAMAL A/P MUNUSAMY 2. ) TAMBYRASAH A/L VYTHILINGAM

Citation

AA-22NCvC-105-12/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

AA-22NCvC-105-12/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The court exercised its discretion under Order 34 rule 2(4) ROC to set aside the default judgment because the defendants had engaged solicitors, provided documents and fees, and the non-compliance with pre-trial directions resulted from their solicitors' failings rather than any deliberate default by the defendants; relief was granted on terms requiring compliance within one month and payment of costs to the plaintiff.
13 Dec 2021

BATHAMANI A/L SUPPIAH [IC NO: 571023-08-5350] GANNANAN A/P BANGARU [IC NO: 580820-08-5868]

Citation

AA-22NCvC-15-02/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

AA-22NCvC-15-02/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The Court, exercising its discretion under Order 34 ROC and the unless order of 9 November 2021, struck out the Defendant's defence and counterclaim for failure to comply with pre‑trial directions after express notice and ordered transfer of the property to the Plaintiff with costs, because the Plaintiff had complied and the Defendant did not meet the mandatory pre‑trial requirements.

Malaysia Case Law

TETUAN JUBLIN TAN & TEY 1. ) WONG SEK ER 2. ) TEY POH CHOON 3. ) HOLSTEN MARKETING (M) SDN BHD

RCB MARKETING SDN BHD MILANO MARKETING SDN BHD

DHAMODARAN A/L MUNUSAMY 1. ) KAVARIAMAL A/P MUNUSAMY 2. ) TAMBYRASAH A/L VYTHILINGAM

BATHAMANI A/L SUPPIAH [IC NO: 571023-08-5350] GANNANAN A/P BANGARU [IC NO: 580820-08-5868]