2 Sept 2025
SHANGHAI YUANYI TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD 1. ) SYAHAZLIN HERRYTHA BINTI ZULKEPLI 2. ) VINOD SHARMA A/L BALBIR SINGH 3. ) VINOD SHARMA LAW FIRM 4. ) MOHD KHAIRIL NIZAM BIN MOHD K JABAYEE
- Citation
- BA-22NCvC-467-11/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-22NCvC-467-11/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The court held that the affidavits in enclosures 26 and 30 should not be expunged: Gao Zhenyu, as the Plaintiff's authorised business representative, had sufficient authority and personal knowledge to depose the affidavits for interlocutory purposes; the affidavit material was relevant to rebut defendants' applications (security for costs and Order 14A) and was not shown to be scandalous, irrelevant or oppressive; submissions of law in enclosure 45 were struck as improper in an affidavit; the inherent jurisdiction under Order 92 was not appropriately engaged and therefore should not be exerci…