23 Oct 2025
1. ) PUGANESVARAN A/L LACHEMANAN 2. ) NAGARAJAN A/L S. LACHEMANAN LACHEMANAN A/L SINNASAMY
- Citation
- B-02(IM)(NCvC)-1817-11/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- IM
- Case number
- B-02(IM)(NCvC)-1817-11/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Order 45 Rule 6(1) does not empower the court to fix a further and additional time for performance after the original time has lapsed due to non-compliance; however, the court may, under its inherent jurisdiction pursuant to Order 92 r 4, make consequential orders (including fixing a new date) to give effect to a continuing injunction; such consequential orders do not offend the doctrine of functus officio and a prior committal and fine do not discharge the continuing obligation to comply with the injunction.