6 Mar 2025
XXXX XXXX
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-364-10/2016 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-22NCC-364-10/2016 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Leave to execute was granted because the plaintiff identified the judgment and the outstanding debt, demonstrated that the delay was caused by negotiations and part payments by the judgment debtor (sufficient reason under Order 46 rule 3), and there was no concluded settlement or evidence that superseded or extinguished the judgment; therefore the exercise of discretion favored granting leave.