19 Nov 2025
SOON HOE CHUAN GLOMAC BERHAD
- Citation
- W-02(NCvC)(W)-2115-12/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- NCvC
- Case number
- W-02(NCvC)(W)-2115-12/2023 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
The LOA was a valid and binding contract as accepted by the Respondent through its director (Datuk Richard Fong) and the Respondent’s failure to call him warranted an adverse inference under s114(g) Evidence Act 1950; however the LOA was subsequently discharged by frustration when SOSB’s receivership and GASB’s acquisition and solo development of the 200-acre land fundamentally changed the contractual adventure, so the parties were discharged from the LOA obligations.