14 Jan 2025
GLENN WILLIAM ONEILL CHANG AI NEE
- Citation
- WA-24NCvC-3302-09/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-24NCvC-3302-09/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
No substantial dispute of fact existed because the defendant admitted the written agreements and delay in payment; the alleged oral agreement could not displace the clear written terms due to Section 91 Evidence Act 1950; therefore oral evidence was unnecessary and the application to convert the originating summons to a writ was dismissed.