Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Privity and locus standi

Legal area

Court

22 Jan 2026

IRWADI BIN IBRAHIM AZMAN BIN JA'AFAR

Citation

JA-22NCvC-93-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

JA-22NCvC-93-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The writ and statement of claim were struck out under Order 18 Rule 19(1)(a) and cumulatively (d) because the pleaded dates show the claims are clearly time‑barred under Section 6 Limitation Act 1953, and because the claimed contract relied on an unenforceable moneylending transaction by an unlicensed lender and involved lack of privity, such that continuation would be an abuse of process.
24 Jan 2022

Abu Yaziz Bin Lazim Koperasi Permodalan Melayu Wilayah Muda/Sik Kedah Berhad PENCELAH Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad

Citation

KB-A52NCvC-1-01/2021 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Court

Sessions Court
Case number

KB-A52NCvC-1-01/2021 (Mahkamah Sesyen)

Defendant's responses were bare denials unsupported by particulars or evidence, defendant admitted key documents and payments including the additional agreement and RM64,160 payment; therefore the additional agreement was valid and binding for all three lots and plaintiff's uncontested claims for RM64,000 (second instalment) and RM14,000 (loan balance) were established as clear claims warranting summary disposal; defendant's counterclaim was unsupported and dismissed.