Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Topic

Purchase order

Legal area

Court

28 Feb 2025

MZHR RESOURCES FIZZ ASSOCIATES SDN BHD

Citation

MC-A72-1-02/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Court

Magistrates' Court
Case number

MC-A72-1-02/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)

Plaintiff breached express terms of the Purchase Orders by failing to provide skilled labour, abandoning the site before completion and delivering defective workmanship; Plaintiff failed to prove completion and entitlement to claimed sums on balance of probabilities, therefore Plaintiff's claim is dismissed and Defendant's counterclaim for costs to rectify defects is allowed.
22 Mar 2024

TELEKOM MALAYSIA BERHAD AEROVATION SDN BHD

Citation

BA-22NCC-151-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

BA-22NCC-151-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The LOA and subsequent purchase order constituted a binding contract independent of any government contract; the COA and without prejudice correspondence evidenced an agreed mobilisation fee which the defendant admitted and failed to pay; therefore the plaintiff was entitled to judgment for RM2,722,080 with interest and costs.