31 Oct 2025
Revolusi Rancak Sdn Bhd Bukit Melita Sdn Bhd
- Citation
- WA-22NCvC-275-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-22NCvC-275-04/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Plaintiff was not continuously ready and willing to perform; the Consent Order did not vary the SPA’s contractual sequence; plaintiff failed to prove loss of profits or unjust enrichment because the SPA remained operative and evidential proof was speculative; defendant entitled to contractual interest at 8% p.a. for late payment but only up to the effective date of the Consent Order; plaintiff's claim dismissed and defendant's counterclaim allowed in part with costs RM10,000.