21 Jun 2024
LAW MAY HUI@JULIET TEE KEN PING
- Citation
- BA-24F-257-09/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-24F-257-09/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Application dismissed because plaintiff failed to identify specific disputed facts that would justify cross-examination, relied on suspicion and bald denials (fishing), sought irrelevant and premature corporate documents beyond scope of interim maintenance, and was estopped by prior winding-up proceedings; discovery and leave to cross-examine refused as unnecessary and oppressive.