7 Jul 2022
SL AQUA BUILDING SDN. BHD. ISMAIL BIN ABU HASSAN
- Citation
- AA-22NCvC-79-09/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- AA-22NCvC-79-09/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The revocation of the Power of Attorney was valid because it was signed by two authorised directors in compliance with Companies Act s66 and there was insufficient evidence of duress; the Plaintiff materially breached the SPA by failing to pay the balance within the contractual period (time was of the essence), entitling the Defendant to lawfully terminate and forfeit the deposit; nonetheless the Plaintiff proved part benefits conferred and is entitled to restitution/compensation under s.71, resulting in an award totalling RM243,423.30 to the Plaintiff.