28 Oct 2022
UNG SIEW TOUR 1. ) SUTTHIESWARAN A/L RAMAN 2. ) HARRIWINTHERAN A/L RAMAN 3. ) ABEERHAMIE A/P RAMAN 4. ) YOGESWARI W/P SUPAYAH 5. ) RAMAN A/L ELANGOVAN
- Citation
- BB-A72NCvC-495-09/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
- Court
- Magistrates' Court
- Case number
- BB-A72NCvC-495-09/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
The court allowed the plaintiff's application to issue a writ of possession because a Rule 14 judgment for vacant possession had been obtained and remained unappealed, defendants had been given opportunity to respond, and there was no evidence that the plaintiff consented to delay or to allow defendants to remain without payment; defendants' negotiations to buy and need for funds did not justify withholding enforcement.