Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Sop compliance

Legal area

Court

21 Jul 2025

1. ) PERSATUAN PERLINDUNGAN HAIWAN KLUANG, JOHOR 2. ) NASIR BIN A AZIZ 1. ) MAJILIS PERBANDARAN KLUANG 2. ) YANG DIPERTUA MAJLIS PERBANDARAN KLUANG PENCELAH Jabatan Peguam Negara

Citation

JA-25-14-05/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

JA-25-14-05/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The application for leave to commence judicial review was dismissed because the material decisions or acts said to have occurred on 4.2.2025 were challenged only by a leave application filed on 7.5.2025, which exceeded the three-month limitation under A.53 Kaedah Mahkamah 2012; the evidence (videos and photos) did not establish the alleged SOP breaches or unlawful burial alive, and there was no reviewable decision attributable to 7.2.2025 that entitled the applicants to relief.
18 Sept 2023

1. ) MISPAR BIN SOPAH 2. ) RAJASEKAR A/L VELAPPAN 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) Ketua Polis Negara 3. ) KETUA POLIS NEGERI JOHOR 4. ) MOHD EFIEZ BIN MUSTAFA

Citation

JA-A71KJ-33-11/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Court

Magistrates' Court
Case number

JA-A71KJ-33-11/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)

On the balance of probabilities the court found Defendant Fourth negligent in a substantive collision with the plaintiffs' taxi; the plaintiffs' evidence and contemporaneous police reports were more consistent than defendants' later account; the statutory and regulatory defences did not relieve liability because the police rider drove in a dangerous/unreasonable manner and failed to take adequate warning steps; defendants 1-3 are vicariously liable for defendant 4; contributory negligence of plaintiffs assessed at 10% and defendants liable for 90%; special damages proven and awarded as pleade…
22 Sept 2022

MOHAMAD AZUANDI BIN MAT [ ]

Citation

AA-41S(A)-2-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

A
Case number

AA-41S(A)-2-03/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The High Court allowed the appeal because unexplained discrepancy in the identity of the urine sample (difference in number of seals) and non‑compliance with IGSO F103 and KKM Guidelines (which the court held to have force of law) created reasonable doubt; consequently the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the conviction and sentence were unsafe and set aside.

Malaysia Case Law

1. ) PERSATUAN PERLINDUNGAN HAIWAN KLUANG, JOHOR 2. ) NASIR BIN A AZIZ 1. ) MAJILIS PERBANDARAN KLUANG 2. ) YANG DIPERTUA MAJLIS PERBANDARAN KLUANG PENCELAH Jabatan Peguam Negara

1. ) MISPAR BIN SOPAH 2. ) RAJASEKAR A/L VELAPPAN 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) Ketua Polis Negara 3. ) KETUA POLIS NEGERI JOHOR 4. ) MOHD EFIEZ BIN MUSTAFA

MOHAMAD AZUANDI BIN MAT [ ]