3 Dec 2025
1. ) CHONG NGIT SOOI 2. ) HO PEAK HWA 3. ) YEE CHUNG TUCK 4. ) YEE YING YING 5. ) TAY JEAN SEAN 6. ) TAY CHOON HOW 7. ) PANG JIAN YONG 8. ) PANG TSE FUI 9. ) TAN HOON THEAN 10. ) TAN NING PEI 11. ) SOW TIAP 12. ) TAN NING XIN KAISAR MAXIM S
- Citation
- BA-12ANCvC-39-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-12ANCvC-39-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The extension of time dated 2 August 2017 was invalid because it was granted after Regulation 11(3) of the HDR had been declared ultra vires on 15 June 2017 and therefore there was no lawful enabling authority to extend the Schedule H 36‑month completion period; accordingly the developer remained bound by the 36‑month period, the Plaintiffs’ LAD claim was legally sustainable, the Sessions Court erred in allowing the Defendant’s Order 14A application, and summary judgment under Order 14 was properly entered for the Plaintiffs.