Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Malaysia Case Law

Section 112 statement
  • 1 Oct 2025

    YONG CHOO KIONG

    Citation
    05(L)-30-03/2024(A) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)
    Court
    L
    Case number
    05(L)-30-03/2024(A) (Mahkamah Persekutuan)

    Section 265A(2) and (3) CPC is a valid legislative provision that lawfully permits in-camera inquiry without the accused and counsel; the trial judge properly applied s.265A and s.20 Witness Protection Act 2009, and did not breach Articles 5(1) or 8(1) FC; s.182A CPC was complied with because the appellant's cautioned statement was in substance the same as his oral evidence; the trial judge's finding that PW15 was credible and her evidence was corroborated by contemporaneous distress calls, diary entries, police report, CCTV opportunity evidence and medical examination was sound and not to be…