6 May 2026
1. ) CHENG RUEY HOE 2. ) QUEK SUAN SAY
- Citation
- WA-44-209-12/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-44-209-12/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The High Court held the re‑charge WA‑62D‑800‑12/2025 was bad in law and set aside because the prosecution had not properly invoked s254, the original proceedings remained subject to s173 analysis by the trial judge, and the prosecution failed to justify adjournments (no medical certificates). The High Court remitted the matter to the Sessions Court to conduct the required s173 analysis and determine the correct disposition of the original charge.