Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Section 503 companies act 2016

Legal area

Court

25 Feb 2026

1. ) SELANGOR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION SDN. BHD. 2. ) GREAT VIEW ALUMINIUM SDN. BHD. 3. ) ACE BUILDING MATERIALS SDN. BHD. 4. ) WORLDWIDE ALUMINIUM BUILDER SDN. BHD. 5. ) CTSM GEOTECHNOLOGY SDN. BHD. 6. ) SEN LENG TRADING 7. ) BESTECH BUILDER

Citation

WA-22NCC-428-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-22NCC-428-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The strike‑out application was dismissed because the Statement of Claim pleads arguable causes of action in fraud and related wrongdoing; reliance on Section 503 materials as part of factual narrative does not render the claim plainly unsustainable or an abuse of process; admissibility and evidential scope of those materials and reflective loss issues are fact‑sensitive and for trial, not for summary disposal.
25 Feb 2026

1. ) SELANGOR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION SDN. BHD. 2. ) GREAT VIEW ALUMINIUM SDN. BHD. 3. ) ACE BUILDING MATERIALS SDN. BHD. 4. ) WORLDWIDE ALUMINIUM BUILDER SDN. BHD. 5. ) CTSM GEOTECHNOLOGY SDN. BHD. 6. ) SEN LENG TRADING 7. ) BESTECH BUILDER

Citation

WA-22NCC-428-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-22NCC-428-07/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The application to strike out was dismissed because the Statement of Claim pleads arguable causes of action in fraud and related wrongdoing; references to s.503 liquidation materials do not render the pleading obviously unsustainable or an abuse of process and issues of admissibility, weight and derivativeness are fact- and evidence-sensitive matters for trial, not grounds for summary termination.
25 Jul 2024

LOW ENG TACK STONE MASTER CORPORATION BERHAD

Citation

WA-28PW-730-12/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-28PW-730-12/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The ex‑parte public examination order was set aside because the liquidator had already commenced multiple civil suits covering the same allegations and therefore had adequate avenues to obtain evidence; there was no proper prior request for information from the applicant and the order amounted to an abuse of process and a means to fish for evidence, making the public examination unnecessary and oppressive.
25 Jul 2024

1. ) Ong Kow Ee @ Ong Chiow Chuen 2. ) FOO CHOOI WAI STONE MASTER CORPORATION BERHAD

Citation

WA-28PW-733-12/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-28PW-733-12/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The ex‑parte order dated 07.11.2022 was set aside because the Liquidator had already commenced related civil suits and therefore had adequate alternative means (discovery and interrogatories under the Rules of Court 2016) to obtain the required information; the Liquidator failed to make full and frank disclosure of material facts, and the order was oppressive and constituted an abuse of process not in the Respondent’s best interests.

Malaysia Case Law

1. ) SELANGOR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION SDN. BHD. 2. ) GREAT VIEW ALUMINIUM SDN. BHD. 3. ) ACE BUILDING MATERIALS SDN. BHD. 4. ) WORLDWIDE ALUMINIUM BUILDER SDN. BHD. 5. ) CTSM GEOTECHNOLOGY SDN. BHD. 6. ) SEN LENG TRADING 7. ) BESTECH BUILDER

1. ) SELANGOR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION SDN. BHD. 2. ) GREAT VIEW ALUMINIUM SDN. BHD. 3. ) ACE BUILDING MATERIALS SDN. BHD. 4. ) WORLDWIDE ALUMINIUM BUILDER SDN. BHD. 5. ) CTSM GEOTECHNOLOGY SDN. BHD. 6. ) SEN LENG TRADING 7. ) BESTECH BUILDER

LOW ENG TACK STONE MASTER CORPORATION BERHAD

1. ) Ong Kow Ee @ Ong Chiow Chuen 2. ) FOO CHOOI WAI STONE MASTER CORPORATION BERHAD