29 Aug 2023
BUSINESS LEAP (M) BHD XXXX
- Citation
- WA-21NCVC-49-04/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-21NCVC-49-04/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proof that a binding SPA existed because execution of the SPA was a clear condition precedent and no SPA was executed; plaintiff also failed to comply with the unambiguous terms of the accepted second offer despite multiple extensions; defendants lawfully revoked the offer for plaintiff's default and properly forfeited the earnest deposit; consequently specific performance and damages are not granted and claim is dismissed.