6 Jun 2024
1. ) ANGAMMA @ SARASU D/O VERADARAJO 2. ) KANAGAMMA D/O VELAUTHAN 3. ) MICHAEL A/L SAVARIMUTHU 4. ) PALANISAMY A/L PERUMAL 5. ) RAMAIE D/O PONNUSAMY 6. ) SUBRAMANIAM S/O MAYAN 7. ) Wakil-Wakil Diri kepada Harta Pusaka bagi SUKAMANIANI S/O L
- Citation
- BA-24NCvC-543-03/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-24NCvC-543-03/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The application was dismissed because the 1976 agreement remains a valid binding contract identifying each party's portions, it would be inequitable and unjust to terminate co-proprietorship by partition on the affidavit record before a full trial, and factual disputes (encroachment, valuation, enforceability) require witnesses and evidence; additionally the proposed partition raised statutory compliance issues under the NLC.