Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Tribunal procedure

Legal area

Court

16 Jan 2026

MOHD ADIL HAKIM BIN MOHAMAD JAMAL 1. ) TRIBUNAL TUNTUTAN PENGGUNA 2. ) KHAIRULHANA BINTI AHMAD ZIAD

Citation

WA-25-163-06/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-25-163-06/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Applicant failed to prove breach of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction or Wednesbury irrationality; tribunal had valid notice, acted within s111 and applicable regulations, properly considered Form 12 and evidence, and the High Court will not re-open merits — accordingly the judicial review application is dismissed and the tribunal award is affirmed with costs.
4 Sept 2024

IMIKA EMPIRE SDN BHD 1. ) LOW SOO TENG 2. ) TRIBUNAL TUNTUTAN PENGGUNA

Citation

JA-25-4-02/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

JA-25-4-02/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The High Court held the Tribunal validly exercised its power under Regulation 21 after being satisfied that notice of the hearing was properly served; proceeding in the applicant's absence did not constitute illegality, irrationality or procedural impropriety and therefore there was no basis to grant judicial review to set aside the Tribunal award.
16 Nov 2022

ZUBICON SDN BHD 1. ) Mohamed Imran Bin J. Abdul Buhari 2. ) TRIBUNAL TUNTUTAN PEMBELI RUMAH

Citation

PA-25-26-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

PA-25-26-05/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The High Court allowed the application for certiorari and quashed the Tribunal award because the Tribunal failed to apply clause 30(2) of the Sale and Purchase Agreement which required the purchaser to give the developer the opportunity to carry out repairs within the contractual periods; that failure made the Tribunal's decision irrational and unlawful.
1 Jan 1900

BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA THE HAVEN LAKESIDE RESIDENCES (NO. PERBADANAN : BIL 06/2014, PESURUHJAYA BANGUNAN MAJLIS BANDARAYA IPOH) 1. TRIBUNAL PERUMAHAN DAN PENGURUSAN STRATA ZON UTARA 2. YAW SUK CHUN (NO. K/P: 660527-08-5068)

Citation

PA-25-38-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

PA-25-38-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The High Court held there was sufficient doubt as to whether the 2nd Respondent received the notice and the Tribunal did not err in setting aside the Award and reinstating the claim; the Tribunal acted fairly under S.113 and gave appropriate relief without causing prejudice to the Applicant; accordingly the judicial review application was dismissed for lacking merit.

Malaysia Case Law

MOHD ADIL HAKIM BIN MOHAMAD JAMAL 1. ) TRIBUNAL TUNTUTAN PENGGUNA 2. ) KHAIRULHANA BINTI AHMAD ZIAD

IMIKA EMPIRE SDN BHD 1. ) LOW SOO TENG 2. ) TRIBUNAL TUNTUTAN PENGGUNA

ZUBICON SDN BHD 1. ) Mohamed Imran Bin J. Abdul Buhari 2. ) TRIBUNAL TUNTUTAN PEMBELI RUMAH

BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA THE HAVEN LAKESIDE RESIDENCES (NO. PERBADANAN : BIL 06/2014, PESURUHJAYA BANGUNAN MAJLIS BANDARAYA IPOH) 1. TRIBUNAL PERUMAHAN DAN PENGURUSAN STRATA ZON UTARA 2. YAW SUK CHUN (NO. K/P: 660527-08-5068)