12 Sept 2023
PEMPETISYEN C H A N 1. ) S H A N 2. ) XXXX 3. ) K H A N PIHAK KETIGA A L I R
- Citation
- WA-33-546-09/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-33-546-09/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Procedural non-compliance with the Divorce Rules was irregular but not prejudicial and did not justify dismissal; there was a material change in circumstances (children no longer resident and deterioration of vehicle) to vary ancillary relief limited to pragmatic adjustments: driver employment must comply with Employment Act and normal working hours (overtime to be arranged and paid by Petitioner), Respondent may provide a temporary replacement vehicle of any model when the Mercedes-Benz breaks down until repaired, and the Respondent remains responsible for providing a full-time domestic help…