28 Sept 2025
TAN JUN SIANG 1. ) KAMALUDIN BIN SAID 2. ) CHE ANI BIN AJI
- Citation
- KA-24NCvC-556-11/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- KA-24NCvC-556-11/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The tenancy agreement was valid because it constituted an initial three-year tenancy followed by a further three-year term permitted under section 10 of the Malay Reservation Enactment; clause 5 did not confer a unilateral right to terminate by one month's notice and there was no breach by the plaintiff, therefore the purported notice of termination was invalid and of no effect; defendants are prohibited from disturbing the plaintiff's possession and costs were awarded.