1 Apr 2026
PERBADANAN ASET KERETAPI LOO SWEE NAN
- Citation
- BD-A52NCC-40-06/2024 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Case number
- BD-A52NCC-40-06/2024 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
The SST signed by both parties constituted a valid and binding contract because the document contained clear acceptance language, the parties' subsequent conduct and correspondence demonstrated an intention to be bound, the SST did not state it was non‑binding pending execution of a formal lease, and the Defendant failed to prove misrepresentation or that the offer had lapsed; consequently Plaintiff proved the unpaid rent claim on balance of probabilities and is entitled to judgment and costs.