24 Nov 2020
Ter Thian Tin 1. Ter Wei Hong 2. Lee Saik Choo 3. Ter Siew Lan 4. Lim Suk Yee 5. Ter Chin Heng
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-256-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-22NCC-256-06/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The 4 March 2020 appointments were valid because they were passed at a physical board meeting and governed by Articles 80 and 82 rather than Article 90; the plaintiff had notice, sent a representative, participated in subsequent board business and signed documents thereby acquiescing and being estopped from challenging the appointments; the injunction application failed as there was no bona fide serious issue to be tried and the relief sought would unlawfully interfere with internal company management; the claim was an abuse of process and was properly struck out under Order 18 r 19.