Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Admissibility of part b documents

Legal area

Court

30 Jan 2024

Chai Kin Hin (Si Mati) 1. ) GOH MIAW HENG 2. ) Chai Seong Yin

Citation

BA-12B-1-01/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

BA-12B-1-01/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The trial judge’s factual findings that plaintiffs failed to prove the RM500 monthly rent, that the tenant occupied with the deceased owner’s knowledge and that others (including the second defendant’s father) collected rent were supported by the evidence and adequately explained; the administrator’s authority in respect of the property only crystallised for the estate on 15 July 2020 after amendment so claims for earlier periods were not maintainable; appellate intervention was not justified and the appeal is dismissed.
12 Dec 2023

FUJI XEROX ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD 1. ) BUMI XEROX SDN BHD 2. ) ROHAYA BINTI AHMAD 3. ) TUNKU JOHANEZ BIN TUNKU ANNUAR 4. ) MOHD ADRI BIN ZULKIPLI

Citation

KA-22NCvC-104-09/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

KA-22NCvC-104-09/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Plaintiff proved delivery, usage, invoicing, valid termination and demand; Part B documents and statements of account are admissible and unrebutted; demands were properly served under the guarantees; guarantees are continuing and render 2nd–4th Defendants jointly and severally liable as principal debtors despite the dissolution of the 1st Defendant; GST on sums incurred prior to repeal is recoverable; Plaintiff entitled to post-termination monthly rentals and six months' rental for non-return; judgment entered for Plaintiff with costs RM20,000.
16 Aug 2021

BAHTERA SRI KANDI MARINE SDN BHD (NO. SYARIKAT : 870175-K) 1. ) NURULHUDA NADIA BINTI ZULKIFLI (NO. K/P : 880925-56-5088) 2. ) ZULKIFLI BIN MOHD GHADZALI (NO. K/P : 560921-08-5623) 3. ) KHAIRUL AMIR BIN HAMDAN (NO. K/P : 840727-10-6087) 4.

Citation

WA-22NCVC-179-04/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-22NCVC-179-04/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

On the balance of probabilities the court found Defendant 1 deliberately manipulated payroll files to divert company funds and that Defendants 2,4,5 and 6 knowingly received and benefited from those funds; consequently the plaintiff established causation and entitlement to restitution/damages totalling RM1,642,715 and ancillary relief (interest and costs); third‑party claims against Defendant 1 by D4, D5, D6 were dismissed.

Malaysia Case Law

Chai Kin Hin (Si Mati) 1. ) GOH MIAW HENG 2. ) Chai Seong Yin

FUJI XEROX ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD 1. ) BUMI XEROX SDN BHD 2. ) ROHAYA BINTI AHMAD 3. ) TUNKU JOHANEZ BIN TUNKU ANNUAR 4. ) MOHD ADRI BIN ZULKIPLI

BAHTERA SRI KANDI MARINE SDN BHD (NO. SYARIKAT : 870175-K) 1. ) NURULHUDA NADIA BINTI ZULKIFLI (NO. K/P : 880925-56-5088) 2. ) ZULKIFLI BIN MOHD GHADZALI (NO. K/P : 560921-08-5623) 3. ) KHAIRUL AMIR BIN HAMDAN (NO. K/P : 840727-10-6087) 4.