9 Sept 2025
Chai Ching Nang London Weight Management Sdn. Bhd.
- Citation
- BA-12BNCvC-22-04/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-12BNCvC-22-04/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The appeal is dismissed because the High Court found no error in the Sessions Court's admission of employment letters, letters of undertaking and AES computer-generated records under the Evidence Act; the letters were validly signed and enforceable; the plaintiff proved on the balance of probabilities that customers had unutilized amounts and that advance commissions totalling RM188,770.22 were repayable; the defendant failed to produce customer evidence or documentary proof to rebut the AES records or to substantiate her counterclaims, and concurrent factual findings were not displaced on ap…