3 Feb 2025
Trudy Ranjini Ganendra 1. ) Dato' Dennis Ganendra 2. ) Minconsult Sdn. Bhd. 3. ) Dato Sri Roslan Bin Muhammad Tahar PIHAK TERKILAN Dato Wan Razali Bin Wan Muda
- Citation
- WA-24NCC-551-12/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-24NCC-551-12/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Application dismissed because the proposed evidence was not new, the plaintiff failed to provide an adequate explanation for the inordinate delay after affidavits were closed, the Pannir Selvam tripartite factors were not satisfied, allowing the affidavit would cause disproportionate prejudice and delay to defendants and undermine finality and economical use of court time; Ladd v Marshall is inapplicable in this interlocutory first‑instance context and, even if applied, its criteria were unmet.