16 Jun 2020
BRAND ACE SDN BHD 1. ) RAPID RAIL SDN BHD 2. ) PRASARANA INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD
- Citation
- WA-22NCVC-269-05/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-22NCVC-269-05/2017 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Enclosure 28 was dismissed because the court found the requested documents (tenancy agreements, audited revenue reports 2011–2018, and emails) were not necessary for a fair disposal of the suit nor for saving costs under Order 24: tenancy agreements were not pleaded as material, audited consolidated reports were not in defendants' possession and would impose oppressive burden, emails originated from plaintiff and their loss does not shift plaintiff's burden; the application was also unacceptably delayed and amounted to a fishing expedition.