14 Nov 2022
NASAHARUDIN BIN MOHD ISA 1. ) MOHAN A/L PARAMASIVAM 2. ) GURDIT SINGH A/L KESAR SINGH 3. ) TETUAN SHARIF & KHOO 4. ) RAMASAMY A/L AMAIAPPAN 5. ) LIM CHEE KIAN 6. ) TETUAN LIM RAM & ASSOCIATES
- Citation
- N-02(NCvC)(W)-1300-09/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- NCvC
- Case number
- N-02(NCvC)(W)-1300-09/2020 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Court held R.2–R.6 owed a duty of care to the Appellant despite no direct retainer because they assumed custody of the original title knowing the Consent Judgment terms and could reasonably foresee the Appellant's loss; by refusing or failing to return the title and by releasing it and/or proceeds without ensuring payment they breached that duty and caused the Appellant's loss; appeal allowed in part and judgment entered against Respondents jointly and severally for RM1,447,272 plus special damages and interest; costs ordered.