4 Jan 2024
YAP SEE YAH [ ]
- Citation
- W-09-363-10/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- W-09-363-10/2022 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
D26 (the screenshot) was a computer-produced document sourced from the appellant's phone and was inadmissible because the statutory safeguards under s90A Evidence Act were not satisfied and s90A(7) barred admission by the accused; the defence witness SB3 was an afterthought and did not create reasonable doubt; independent testimony (SP1, SP3, SP4) and surrounding facts proved trafficking under s13 read with s34 beyond reasonable doubt; conviction was therefore upheld but sentence reduced on mitigation.