7 Jul 2025
BORHAN BIN MOHAMAD MEGABINA TRADING
- Citation
- CB-12BNCvC-5-11/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- CB-12BNCvC-5-11/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
No clerical mistake or slip within the meaning of Order 20 r 11 was shown; the contention amounted to an attempt to re‑open or vary the substantive terms of a perfected consent judgment. The Sessions Court therefore did not err in finding it was functus officio for the purpose of varying the consent judgment and in refusing the amendment. Absent evidence of a slip or vitiating factors justifying setting aside the consent judgment, the appeal must be dismissed.