Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Failure to control vehicle

Legal area

Court

6 Nov 2025

MOHD AL HAFIS BIN JAMALUDIN

Citation

PB-86POL-3095-02/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Court

Magistrates' Court
Case number

PB-86POL-3095-02/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)

After maximum evaluation the prosecution evidence was insufficient and suffered material inconsistencies and omissions (notably lack of proof accused overtook on opposing lane and complainant's failure to confirm use of signal); reasonable inferences favoured the accused; accordingly no prima facie case existed and the accused was discharged and acquitted without being called to answer.
10 Oct 2025

NORDIN BIN ABDUL AZIZ

Citation

AJ-86POL-643-02/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Court

Magistrates' Court
Case number

AJ-86POL-643-02/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)

Prosecution failed to prove a prima facie case because the key eyewitness evidence (SP1) was not credible and was based on assumption; on maximum evaluation of prosecution evidence and drawing inferences favourable to the accused the court could not safely require the accused to make his defence, therefore accused was acquitted at the close of the prosecution case.
10 Oct 2025

NORDIN BIN ABDUL AZIZ

Citation

AJ-86POL-643-02/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Court

Magistrates' Court
Case number

AJ-86POL-643-02/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)

Applying the mandatory maximum evaluation at the close of the prosecution case the court found the primary witness (SP1) not credible, prosecution failed to prove the essential element that the accused was careless in controlling the motorcycle, and therefore no prima facie case was established; accused must be acquitted and discharged.

Malaysia Case Law

MOHD AL HAFIS BIN JAMALUDIN

NORDIN BIN ABDUL AZIZ

NORDIN BIN ABDUL AZIZ