Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Fraud/collusion

Legal area

Court

10 Nov 2025

PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN KONDOMINIUM VILLA SCOTT HARI RAMAN A/L PALAYA

Citation

WA-A72NCvC-3714-08/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Court

Magistrates' Court
Case number

WA-A72NCvC-3714-08/2024 (Mahkamah Majistret)

The July 23, 2020 letter, read objectively, contemplated invoicing for actual work rather than an automatic monthly retainer; the Defendant produced no contemporaneous evidence of services to support six identical invoices; because no services justified the payments, retention of RM12,000.00 amounted to unjust enrichment and the Defendant was ordered to refund that sum with interest and costs.
4 Oct 2023

1. ) NAZIF BIN RIDHWANUDDIN 2. ) RIDHWANUDDIN BIN ABD KADIR 1. ) MALATHI A/P MUNISAMY 2. ) VISVABARATHI A/P MUNISAMY 3. ) AIA GENERAL BERHAD

Citation

AA-A53KJ-303-08/2018 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Court

Sessions Court
Case number

AA-A53KJ-303-08/2018 (Mahkamah Sesyen)

Plaintiffs failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendants' vehicle struck the plaintiff's motorcycle; key evidence was unreliable or hearsay (SP4, 999 call information as relayed, inconsistent police investigation and photographs, and deficiencies in IO evidence). As plaintiffs did not discharge the burden, the claim is dismissed with costs. Separately, insurer (Defendant Third) proved fraud on a balance of probabilities but the plaintiffs' substantive claim still fails for lack of proof.
31 Jul 2023

MUHAMMAD ZAIRUL BIN YAHYA 1. ) ZAIL BIN BADROL HISHAM 2. ) MOHAMAD KHAIRI BIN ITHNIN PENCELAH THE PACIFIC INSURANCE BERHAD

Citation

BK-A53KJ-305-11/2020 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Court

Sessions Court
Case number

BK-A53KJ-305-11/2020 (Mahkamah Sesyen)

Plaintiffs failed to prove their claims on the balance of probabilities; material evidence showed late reporting, inconsistent statements, lack of independent corroboration and an SKVE log indicating both motorcycles skidded on tyre debris; on that basis the court found there was sufficient evidence of collusion/fraud and dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims with costs.
30 Sept 2020

Muhammad Arief for the Respondent [Messrs Arief & Iskandar] LAIN-LAIN Sathya Kumar Das for the Petitioner [Messrs Shearn Delamore & Co]

Citation

COMPANIES WINDING-UP NO.: WA-28NCC-285-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

COMPANIES WINDING-UP NO.: WA-28NCC-285-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The court dismissed the stay application because the Respondent failed to demonstrate the requisite 'special circumstances' to justify a stay; the 27.8.2019 High Court order is final and binding and the Respondent failed to show the debt was bona fide disputed or that it is solvent, therefore the winding-up petition succeeds and an Order in Terms is granted for the petition with costs.

Malaysia Case Law

PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN KONDOMINIUM VILLA SCOTT HARI RAMAN A/L PALAYA

1. ) NAZIF BIN RIDHWANUDDIN 2. ) RIDHWANUDDIN BIN ABD KADIR 1. ) MALATHI A/P MUNISAMY 2. ) VISVABARATHI A/P MUNISAMY 3. ) AIA GENERAL BERHAD

MUHAMMAD ZAIRUL BIN YAHYA 1. ) ZAIL BIN BADROL HISHAM 2. ) MOHAMAD KHAIRI BIN ITHNIN PENCELAH THE PACIFIC INSURANCE BERHAD

Muhammad Arief for the Respondent [Messrs Arief & Iskandar] LAIN-LAIN Sathya Kumar Das for the Petitioner [Messrs Shearn Delamore & Co]