11 Nov 2019
MUSTAZA BIN ABDUL RAHMAN
- Citation
- W-06A(SH)-2-01/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- SH
- Case number
- W-06A(SH)-2-01/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Convictions for counts 1 and 3 are affirmed because the prosecution proved identity (telco records, seized handset with Telegram account name and preserved chat logs) and proved that the appellant's Telegram posts and online baiah constituted support for a terrorist organisation under the wide definition in s130J; SP7's expert evidence was admissible and persuasive. Conviction under count 2 (failure to report under s130M) is set aside because at the material time no statutory duty in the old Criminal Procedure Code required reporting of the terrorism offences charged and the appellant, a poli…