22 Dec 2025
TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD CHOO LEE CHEN
- Citation
- BL-B52NCvC-8-02/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Case number
- BL-B52NCvC-8-02/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
On the balance of probabilities the plaintiff proved meter interference under s.37 by objective technical evidence (direct bypass wiring and clamp meter load disparity) and thereby established entitlement to recover loss of revenue under s.38(3); the defendant, as the registered consumer, is liable irrespective of tenancy, personal involvement or subjective knowledge; the plaintiff's BKM (Maximum Demand Load) method was a proper, guideline‑approved and reasonably applied method to compute RM359,474.27; s.38(4) written statements were certified and served and constitute prima facie evidence.