5 May 2023
1. ) M. RAMACHANDRAN A/L MUTHUSAMY 2. ) MURUGIAH A/L MUNUSAMY 3. ) GENGAN A/L KRISHNAN 4. ) S. SIVAMANIAM A/L SUBRAMANIAM 5. ) MAHALETCHUMY A/P BALASUBRAMANIAM 6. ) RAMESH A/L N.RAMACHANDRAN 1. ) RAVI A/L VELOO 2. ) KRISHNAMOORTHI A/L C. VA
- Citation
- BA-22NCvC-520-10/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-22NCvC-520-10/2018 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Plaintiffs' claims were dismissed because they lacked locus standi, their pleaded relief contradicted the constitutions and applicable statutory regime (Societies Act), the principal decision affecting management rights (order by Insolvency Director/KPI) could not be set aside against a non-party in these proceedings, and Plaintiffs failed to obtain required exemptions under section 49; therefore relief was refused and costs awarded to Defendants.