24 Nov 2025
MANIMARAN A/L VALAKRISHNAN 1. ) RAVIVARMA A/L SHANMUGAM 2. ) THAVANESAN A/L PANCHALINGAM 3. ) THIRUCHELVAM A/L SUBRAMANIAM 4. ) NIMELAN A/L KADIRA VELU 5. ) NANDA KUMARI A/P MUTHU 6. ) BASKARAN NAIR A/L CHINDAN NAIR 7. ) MAHENDRAN A/L T. SI
- Citation
- NA-22NCvC-32-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- NA-22NCvC-32-06/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court held that the suspensions were valid because the disciplinary committee hearings were properly constituted and Plaintiff received notice but elected not to attend or properly pursue remedies (such as an EGM within 60 days); prior committee minutes purporting to invalidate suspensions were tainted by bias because Plaintiff, as President, chaired the meetings; and expulsion under Clause 5.2 was valid given the criminal conviction and the Club’s need to protect its public reputation.