Malaysia Case Law: Decisions & Judgments

Topic

Leave to proceed

Legal area

Court

9 Jul 2025

1. ) KNM GROUP BERHAD 2. ) KNM PROCESS SYSTEMS SDN. BHD. PENCELAH 1. ) Hitachi Zosen Corporation [NOD at Encl. 192] 2. ) IPL Middle East DMCC 3. ) Alam Hzem Sdn Bhd [NOD at Encl. 192] 4. ) Cypark Sdn Bhd 5. ) ANN JOO METAL SDN BHD 6. ) ANN

Citation

WA-24NCC-201-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-24NCC-201-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Given the advanced stage of Suit 14, the presence of foreign witnesses who had travelled and the imminent trial dates, the balance of convenience favoured granting limited, time‑bound leave despite the ad‑interim restraining order; leave was therefore granted only to preserve the 3‑day trial (9–11 July 2025) with a direction that FLS file a formal application to regularise leave.
6 Aug 2024

SYED GAMAL BIN SYED KECHIK AL-BUKHARY ACE CREDIT (M) SDN BHD

Citation

WA-28PW-179-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-28PW-179-04/2024 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Leave under s.471(1) was granted because the counterclaim and defences raise serious and complex questions of illegality and unjust enrichment that cannot be adequately determined in the proof of debt process, the applicant has demonstrated a prima facie case and the action was at an advanced stage with trial fixed; the leave is limited and does not permit enforcement against the company's assets without further leave of the winding up court.
25 Jan 2023

MOHD AMAR BIN MOHAMED SHARIFAH AISYAH BINTI SYED MOHAMED

Citation

WA-23NCvC-113-12/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

WA-23NCvC-113-12/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

The plaintiff failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant wilfully disobeyed the ad‑interim injunction: the defendant provided a credible explanation that the police report was made to secure assistance to recover her children pursuant to a Syariah Court interim custody order after prolonged parental alienation, creating reasonable doubt as to contumacious conduct; therefore committal could not be ordered.
16 Apr 2021

ELITE AGRICULTURE SDN. BHD. (NO. SYARIKAT: 866408-P) 1. HAJEMI BIN DIN 2. PENGHUNI-PENGHUNI LAIN YANG MENDUDUKI DI ATAS TANAH H.S.(D) 9781 NO. PT 9492 MUKIM BERA, DAERAH BERA, NEGERI PAHANG

Citation

CB-24NCVC-140-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
Court

High Court
Case number

CB-24NCVC-140-10/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)

Affidavits and photographic exhibits filed by the applicant, read in the context of the existing vacant possession order dated 16 February 2021, disclose on first impression sufficient evidence of disobedience and obstruction by the respondents to establish a prima facie case for contempt; accordingly leave to commence committal proceedings under Order 52 Rule 3 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 is granted.

Malaysia Case Law

1. ) KNM GROUP BERHAD 2. ) KNM PROCESS SYSTEMS SDN. BHD. PENCELAH 1. ) Hitachi Zosen Corporation [NOD at Encl. 192] 2. ) IPL Middle East DMCC 3. ) Alam Hzem Sdn Bhd [NOD at Encl. 192] 4. ) Cypark Sdn Bhd 5. ) ANN JOO METAL SDN BHD 6. ) ANN

SYED GAMAL BIN SYED KECHIK AL-BUKHARY ACE CREDIT (M) SDN BHD

MOHD AMAR BIN MOHAMED SHARIFAH AISYAH BINTI SYED MOHAMED

ELITE AGRICULTURE SDN. BHD. (NO. SYARIKAT: 866408-P) 1. HAJEMI BIN DIN 2. PENGHUNI-PENGHUNI LAIN YANG MENDUDUKI DI ATAS TANAH H.S.(D) 9781 NO. PT 9492 MUKIM BERA, DAERAH BERA, NEGERI PAHANG