20 Apr 2022
TAWFIQUE HASAN CHOWDHURY 1. ) BWFW MEDIC SDN BHD 2. ) KHAMSIAH BINTI MUDA 3. ) SULONG BIN MUDA 4. ) MOHAMAD HUSAIN BIN MOHD DAWOED 5. ) KHAIRIL ANNUAR BIN MOHD NOOR 6. ) ASFAZIAN BIN CHE RAMLI 7. ) ZAR CONSULYANCY SERVICES SDN BHD 8. ) ASPA
- Citation
- WA-22NCC-397-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- WA-22NCC-397-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The claim is dismissed because the conspiracy cause of action was inadequately pleaded (failed to specify type, agreement particulars, overt acts and predominant purpose) and the Plaintiff failed to prove on the balance of probabilities the requisite intention/predominant purpose to injure and actual pecuniary damage; defendants acted within lawful corporate powers (including commissioning a legal audit and shareholders' voting rights) and relied on legitimate corporate governance decisions.