10 Mar 2020
Sumesh Sudhakaran
- Citation
- B-05(M)-88-02/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
- Court
- M
- Case number
- B-05(M)-88-02/2018 (Mahkamah Rayuan)
Court upheld trial judge's findings: expert forensic evidence and the totality of circumstantial evidence (exposed quantities of drugs, paraphernalia consistent with a lab, DNA profiles on multiple items, premises secured and items within close proximity to appellants, absence of cleaning equipment) established appellants had knowledge, control and participated in manufacturing/processing within the scope of s.2 DDA and had common intention under s.34 Penal Code; trial judge properly evaluated credibility and exhibit identification; therefore convictions and death sentences were affirmed.