29 Sept 2025
SPRING ENERGY SDN. BHD. JAGUH SAKTI SDN. BHD.
- Citation
- TA-A52NCvC-3-01/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Case number
- TA-A52NCvC-3-01/2022 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
Court accepted Plaintiff discharged burden of proof: there was a binding oral agreement incorporating the pleaded terms (supported by drafts and conduct), Plaintiff paid RM300,000 and extracted 30,895.20 m3 as evidenced by documentary detail and survey accepted by the court, Defendant failed to adequately rebut quantity/value evidence or produce necessary witnesses/documents (including OGL proof) and failed to cross-examine on material points; therefore Defendant must refund the balance of the advance after deducting the purchase price, with interest and costs.