30 Sept 2025
XXXX XXXX
- Citation
- BA-22NCVC-431-07/2016 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Court
- High Court
- Case number
- BA-22NCVC-431-07/2016 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
The Court refused leave because the sole operative order for contempt was the Court of Appeal order dated 7 October 2020, that order was not personally served on the Defendant with a penal notice, the penal notice on an earlier High Court order cannot revive deleted terms, and the alleged acts concern temple-management paragraphs which the Court of Appeal had removed; consequently the strict requirements of Order 52 were not met.